1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1946 Skoda Polular 995
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Skoda Polular 995. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Skoda Polular 995 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1946 Skoda Polular 995. (22 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1946 Skoda Polular 995. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1345 kg more than 1946 Skoda Polular 995. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1946 Skoda Polular 995 | |
Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
Model | 62 | Polular 995 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1946 |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 22 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |