1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1948 Humber Super Snipe
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1948 Humber Super Snipe. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1948 Humber Super Snipe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 329 kg more than 1948 Humber Super Snipe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1948 Humber Super Snipe | |
Make | Cadillac | Humber |
Model | 62 | Super Snipe |
Year Released | 1964 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 4086 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1746 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 68 L |