1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1949 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1949 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1949 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1125 kg more than 1949 Triumph Mayflower. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1949 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | 62 | Mayflower |
Year Released | 1964 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 45 L |