1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1950 Triumph Roadster
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Triumph Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Triumph Roadster would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1950 Triumph Roadster. (71 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1950 Triumph Roadster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 912 kg more than 1950 Triumph Roadster. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1950 Triumph Roadster | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | 62 | Roadster |
Year Released | 1964 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2088 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1163 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 54 L |