1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1105 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1952 Holden FX | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 62 | FX |
Year Released | 1964 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |