1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1954 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Ford Thunderbird (225 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 497 kg more than 1954 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1954 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 5114 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1578 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2600 mm |
