1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1955 Talbot T 26
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1955 Talbot T 26. (197 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1955 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 465 kg more than 1955 Talbot T 26. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1955 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Cadillac | Talbot |
Model | 62 | T 26 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1955 |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1890 mm |