1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1958 Ford 17
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 17 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1958 Ford 17. (59 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 960 kg more than 1958 Ford 17. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1958 Ford 17 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | 17 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 55 L |
