1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1963 Lancia Fulvia
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1963 Lancia Fulvia. (90 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lancia Fulvia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1105 kg more than 1963 Lancia Fulvia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1963 Lancia Fulvia | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | 62 | Fulvia |
Year Released | 1964 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 38 L |