1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1963 NSU 1000 C
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1435 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1963 NSU 1000 C | |
| Make | Cadillac | NSU |
| Model | 62 | 1000 C |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 39 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 44 L |
