1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1963 Triumph TR4
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph TR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph TR4 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1963 Triumph TR4. (104 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph TR4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1963 Triumph TR4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1963 Triumph TR4 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | 62 | TR4 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 53 L |
