1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1966 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1315 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | 62 | Fronte |
Year Released | 1964 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 785 cc |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2250 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 66 L |