1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1967 DKW Munga
To start off, 1967 DKW Munga is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1967 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1967 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 965 kg more than 1967 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1967 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Cadillac | DKW |
| Model | 62 | Munga |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 31 L |
