1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1967 Ford Fairlane is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (122 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 720 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Fairlane |
Year Released | 1964 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 68 L |