1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1967 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1967 Ford GT 40 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1967 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2420 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 125 L |
