1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1968 Dodge Polara
To start off, 1968 Dodge Polara is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Dodge Polara (230 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 550 kg more than 1968 Dodge Polara.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1968 Dodge Polara | |
| Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
| Model | 62 | Polara |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 5210 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 5410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 75 L |
