1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1968 Skoda 1202
To start off, 1968 Skoda 1202 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1968 Skoda 1202. (45 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1968 Skoda 1202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 970 kg more than 1968 Skoda 1202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1968 Skoda 1202 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
| Model | 62 | 1202 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1174 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 45 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 30 L |
