1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1968 Volvo 120
To start off, 1968 Volvo 120 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1968 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1968 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | 120 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1777 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2610 mm |