1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1969 Ford 17
To start off, 1969 Ford 17 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1969 Ford 17. (59 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 955 kg more than 1969 Ford 17. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1969 Ford 17 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | 17 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 87 L |