1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1969 Triumph TR6
To start off, 1969 Triumph TR6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1969 Triumph TR6. (150 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1969 Triumph TR6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 900 kg more than 1969 Triumph TR6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1969 Triumph TR6 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | 62 | TR6 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |
