1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1969 Volvo 1800
To start off, 1969 Volvo 1800 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1969 Volvo 1800. (124 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1969 Volvo 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 945 kg more than 1969 Volvo 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1969 Volvo 1800 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | 1800 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 45 L |