1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1972 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1972 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2480 mm |