1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1972 Volvo 145
To start off, 1972 Volvo 145 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1972 Volvo 145. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1972 Volvo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 740 kg more than 1972 Volvo 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1972 Volvo 145 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | 145 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |