1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1977 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 1977 Datsun 280Z is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1977 Datsun 280Z. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1977 Datsun 280Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 830 kg more than 1977 Datsun 280Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1977 Datsun 280Z | |
| Make | Cadillac | Datsun |
| Model | 62 | 280Z |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4399 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1631 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2304 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |
