1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1979 Toyota Sprinter
To start off, 1979 Toyota Sprinter is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 148 more horse power than 1979 Toyota Sprinter. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1979 Toyota Sprinter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1184 kg more than 1979 Toyota Sprinter. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1979 Toyota Sprinter | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | Sprinter |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1166 cc |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 60 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 846 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2380 mm |
