1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1980 Bitter SC
To start off, 1980 Bitter SC is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1980 Bitter SC. (178 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1980 Bitter SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 725 kg more than 1980 Bitter SC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1980 Bitter SC | |
| Make | Cadillac | Bitter |
| Model | 62 | SC |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 178 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 75 L |
