1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1980 Fiat Panda
To start off, 1980 Fiat Panda is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 175 more horse power than 1980 Fiat Panda. (33 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1980 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1360 kg more than 1980 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1980 Fiat Panda | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 62 | Panda |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 770 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 33 HP |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2170 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 40 L |
