1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 1980 Mazda 323 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 134 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1195 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | 323 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 45 L |
