1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1981 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1981 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1981 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | 62 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1964 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 81 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 57 L |