1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1981 Kia Brisa
To start off, 1981 Kia Brisa is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1981 Kia Brisa. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1981 Kia Brisa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1981 Kia Brisa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1981 Kia Brisa | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | 62 | Brisa |
Year Released | 1964 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2270 mm |