1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1982 Vauxhall Astra
To start off, 1982 Vauxhall Astra is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1982 Vauxhall Astra. (53 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1982 Vauxhall Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1982 Vauxhall Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1982 Vauxhall Astra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Vauxhall |
| Model | 62 | Astra |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2520 mm |
