1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1982 ZIL 4104
To start off, 1982 ZIL 4104 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,695 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 ZIL 4104 (311 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 ZIL 4104 weights approximately 1260 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1982 ZIL 4104 | |
| Make | Cadillac | ZIL |
| Model | 62 | 4104 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 7695 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 3335 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2090 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3340 mm |
