1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1983 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1983 Mercury Cougar is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 550 kg more than 1983 Mercury Cougar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1983 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
| Model | 62 | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2650 mm |
