1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 134 more horse power than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1075 kg more than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 62 | Lancer |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1467 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2390 mm |
