1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1987 Acura Integra
To start off, 1987 Acura Integra is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1987 Acura Integra. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1987 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1987 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Acura |
| Model | 62 | Integra |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 113 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4355 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2520 mm |
