1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1989 Mazda 626
To start off, 1989 Mazda 626 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1989 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | 626 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2520 mm |
