1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1989 Nissan Micra
To start off, 1989 Nissan Micra is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1989 Nissan Micra. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1989 Nissan Micra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1305 kg more than 1989 Nissan Micra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1989 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | 62 | Micra |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 725 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 3770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2310 mm |
