1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1990 Chrysler TC
To start off, 1990 Chrysler TC is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1990 Chrysler TC. (174 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1990 Chrysler TC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 601 kg more than 1990 Chrysler TC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1990 Chrysler TC | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | 62 | TC |
Year Released | 1964 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1474 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2370 mm |