1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1990 Ford Orion
To start off, 1990 Ford Orion is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1990 Ford Orion. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Orion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1990 Ford Orion. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1990 Ford Orion | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Orion |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
