1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1990 Lancia Delta
To start off, 1990 Lancia Delta is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1990 Lancia Delta. (200 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1990 Lancia Delta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 825 kg more than 1990 Lancia Delta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1990 Lancia Delta | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
| Model | 62 | Delta |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 57 L |
