1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1991 Fiat Panda
To start off, 1991 Fiat Panda is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1991 Fiat Panda. (51 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1991 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1315 kg more than 1991 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1991 Fiat Panda | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 62 | Panda |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2170 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 38 L |
