1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1991 Ford Sierra
To start off, 1991 Ford Sierra is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1991 Ford Sierra. (74 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1991 Ford Sierra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1991 Ford Sierra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Sierra |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
