1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1992 Renault 19
To start off, 1992 Renault 19 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1992 Renault 19. (79 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault 19. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1135 kg more than 1992 Renault 19. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1992 Renault 19 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | 62 | 19 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 55 L |
