1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320
To start off, 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 (216 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 585 kg more than 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 62 | 320 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 216 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1490 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |
