1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1995 Fiat Brava
To start off, 1995 Fiat Brava is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Brava. (116 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Brava. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 945 kg more than 1995 Fiat Brava. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1995 Fiat Brava | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 62 | Brava |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1745 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2550 mm |
