1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1995 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 1995 Jaguar XJS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Jaguar XJS (220 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 345 kg more than 1995 Jaguar XJS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1995 Jaguar XJS | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | 62 | XJS |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 90 L |
