1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Suburban (247 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 70 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Chevrolet Suburban | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | 62 | Suburban |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 5733 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 9 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 5580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3350 mm |
