1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Fiat Brava
To start off, 1996 Fiat Brava is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Brava. (79 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Brava. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 990 kg more than 1996 Fiat Brava. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Fiat Brava | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 62 | Brava |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1369 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1040 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |
