1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1996 Honda CR-V is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1996 Honda CR-V. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 575 kg more than 1996 Honda CR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | 62 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |