1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Lada 110
To start off, 1996 Lada 110 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1996 Lada 110. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Lada 110 | |
Make | Cadillac | Lada |
Model | 62 | 110 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2500 mm |